top of page

Project Details.

Health, Nutrition & WASH

Client:

Christoffel-Blindenmission (CBM)

Sector:

Health, Nutrition & WASH

Year:

2015

Project Type:

Lesson Learned

Project Title:

Lesson Learned/External Review of CBM Germany's Accessible Integrated Humanitarian Program (Inclusive Education, WASH, Education, Livelihood Skills Development and Food Security) (Peshawar, Charsadda, Mardan, Nowshera in KP)

CBM Germany Pakistan Programme launched it integrated Inclusive Programme which include inclusive education, Health, Livelihood, Water, Sanitation and Hygiene Programme in the 2010 flood affected areas in district Charsadda, Nowshera and Peshawar district respectively by building up on the experience during the 2010 flood relief phase. Mixed research methodologies (qualitative and quantitative data collection methods) were used to conduct the evaluation. 


The evaluation work started with thorough literature reviews, i.e., project proposals, progress reports, LFAs, CBM’s monitoring reports, CBM's child safeguarding policy, and CBM’s toolkit for disability inclusive development (DID) were reviewed and extracted. Key lessons learned revolved around making data collection more inclusive and focusing on people with disabilities. Seventeen focus group discussions (FGDs) were conducted with the members of VDCS, VHCs, and DPOs, children in WASH clubs, teachers and students in schools, and artisans supported through WASH facilities. All of these committees are composed of both male and female members. Another method employed for the collection of qualitative data was key informant interviews. A total of 21 KIIs were conducted with key stakeholders in the project. 


HCPL compiled four case studies, two from the beneficiaries and two from non-beneficiary persons with disabilities (PWDs). The case studies from two beneficiary PWDs provide in-depth information on how the project offerings changed the lives of the beneficiaries and what the key barriers were for not reaching benefits in the lives of non-beneficiaries. The quantitative survey was conducted with the person with disabilities identified by the project. An equal number of beneficiaries and non-beneficiary PWDs were randomly selected to capture the real impact by comparing project results with those of non-beneficiaries.

bottom of page